Master the prioritization of tasksIt's competence that separates teams that move forward from those that exhaust themselves going in circles. Yet, in a French micro-enterprise or SME, everything constantly seems urgent: a client calling back, an invoice to send, a quote to finalize, a meeting that's unavoidable. The result: a lot of activity, little progress. This guide provides you with concrete methods, appropriate tools, and a weekly routine to regain control of your schedule, without getting bogged down in theory.
Why prioritize your tasks: the true cost of being scattered
Before discussing methods, let's consider a thought-provoking statistic. According to a study reported by Sapio Research for Asana, only 26% of work time is truly productive. The remaining 74% is spent on tasks with no direct value: pointless meetings, information searches, manual data entry, and email management.
For a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) with 30 employees, this misalignment has significant financial implications. An SME with 30 employees can lose up to 80,000 euros per year on manual and repetitive tasks, without anyone noticing it on the balance sheet.
Dispersion, a silent trap
This disorganization doesn't resemble laziness. It resembles activity. Emails are answered, meetings are attended, and immediate emergencies are dealt with. But at the end of the week, the important projects haven't progressed an inch.
Researchers at ISEOR (Institute of Socio-Economics of Businesses and Organizations) have documented this phenomenon in over 2,000 organizations: the hidden costs linked to organizational dysfunctions represent between €20,000 and €70,000 per employee per year in French SMEs. Underproductivity and performance gaps constitute the largest share of these costs.
Urgency is not the same as importance.
The first mistake to correct is confusing what is urgent with what is important. A notification, an incoming call, a request from a colleague: all of these seem urgent. But do they actually move your work forward? Rarely.
Prioritizing is precisely about learning to answer this question before acting.
Methods that work: 4 approaches with a small business example for each
The Eisenhower Matrix
This is the standard method, the simplest to adopt immediately. It classifies each task along two axes: urgency and importance. This results in four quadrants:
- Urgent + Important : to be dealt with immediately (blocking customer incident, contractual deadline)
- Important + Not urgent : to be planned within a dedicated time slot (business development, process improvement)
- Urgent + Not important : to be delegated if possible (updating a tool, one-off administrative request)
- Neither urgent nor important : to be eliminated or postponed indefinitely
A concrete example for a very small business: Sophie manages a five-person communications agency. On Monday mornings, she lists all her tasks for the week. She places the overhaul of her service offering, which she had been putting off for three weeks, in the "Important + Not Urgent" quadrant. She delegates the website update to her assistant (urgent but not important to her). She eliminates participation in a webinar unrelated to her objectives. As a result, her Tuesday morning slot is reserved for strategic work.
The MoSCoW method
Originating from the agile world, MoSCoW is particularly useful when working in a team or on a project with multiple stakeholders. It divides tasks into four categories:
- Must have This task is essential; the project will fail without it.
- Should have important but not blocking
- Could have Useful if time permits.
- Won't have (this time) : explicitly outside scope for this period
What makes MoSCoW so valuable is the "Won't Have" category. Explicitly naming what won't be done reduces pressure on the team and aligns expectations from the outset. A practical rule of thumb: limit "Must Have" items to 40-60% of the total scope. If everything is a "Must Have," the method loses its effectiveness.
A concrete example for an SME: Marc runs a 12-person SME in the construction industry. To launch his new energy audit service, he organizes a 30-minute workshop with his team. The result: the creation of a standard quote template (Must), the training of two technicians (Must), the updating of the website (Should), the creation of a sales brochure (Could), and the development of a mobile application (Won't, for this quarter). The team knows exactly what to focus on.
The ABC method
Even simpler to implement on a daily basis, the ABC method assigns a letter to each task according to its level of importance:
- A : major tasks, to be addressed as an absolute priority (serious consequences if not carried out)
- B important but less critical, to be planned
- C Useful but not urgent, to be dealt with if time allows, to be delegated, or to be eliminated
A concrete example for a craftsman: Julien is a self-employed plumber. Every morning, he writes down his tasks and assigns them a letter. Task A: Finish the current job (client is waiting, payment is due). Task B: Call two potential clients for quotes. Task C: Sort his order forms for the month. He always starts with his A's, even though the C's seem easier to send. In three weeks, his quote conversion rate has increased because he calls his potential clients back within 24 hours.
The ICE scoring
Created by Sean Ellis, the founder of the "growth hacking" concept, the ICE method is ideal when no task is either urgent or clearly more important than another. It is based on three criteria rated from 1 to 10:
- Impact What benefit will this action produce if it works?
- Confidence How confident are you in your estimate?
- Ease (ease of execution): how easily can this task be performed?
Formula: ICE Score = Impact x Confidence x Ease
The higher the score, the higher the task rises in the priority list.
A concrete example for a very small startup: Camille runs a small HR consulting firm. She's hesitating between three actions to grow her business: creating a monthly newsletter, launching a training program, or updating her LinkedIn and Malt profiles. She notes each option:
| Action | Impact | Confidence | Ease | Score ICE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newsletter | 7 | 6 | 8 | 336 |
| Training | 9 | 5 | 3 | 135 |
| LinkedIn/Malt Profiles | 6 | 9 | 9 | 486 |
Updating profiles is now the top priority: reasonable impact, high confidence in the outcome, and very easy to implement. Training, although ambitious, is postponed to the following quarter.
How to choose your method according to your activity
There is no one-size-fits-all method. The right choice depends on your specific situation:
- You work alone or in a very small team The Eisenhower matrix or the ABC method is sufficient. They are quick to apply and require no special tools.
- You are managing a project with multiple stakeholders MoSCoW is essential. It forces collective decisions and prevents everyone from prioritizing their own tasks.
- You must choose between several initiatives without a clear urgency. : the ICE scoring gives you an objective ranking in a few minutes.
- Your activity is very responsive (commerce, crafts, customer service): combine the Eisenhower for daily triage and the ABC method to structure your to-do list.
A practical tip: choose a method and stick to it for at least four weeks before changing. Consistency is better than perfection.
The tools: paper, spreadsheet, or project management software
The paper and the notebook
Don't underestimate the power of a notebook and pen. For freelancers and very small businesses, an A4 sheet divided into four quadrants (Eisenhower grid) or a simple list labeled A/B/C is enough to transform a chaotic day into a productive one. The advantage: zero friction, zero learning curve.
The spreadsheet
Google Sheets or Excel allow you to create an ICE matrix or a MoSCoW table that can be shared with the entire team. It's a good middle ground: more structured than paper, but less powerful than dedicated software. Ideal for teams of 2 to 5 people just starting out.
Project management software
For teams managing multiple projects simultaneously, dedicated software is a game-changer. It allows you to visualize priorities, assign tasks, track progress, and collaborate in real time. To learn more about this topic, see our article on... project management.
Criteria to consider when choosing your tool:
- Easy to use If the tool is too complex, the team will not use it.
- Collaboration : ability to assign tasks and track responsibilities
- Multiple views list, Kanban board, calendar
- integrations : connection with your CRM, your invoicing tool, your email
Establish a weekly prioritization routine
Prioritization isn't a one-off exercise. It's a ritual. The most productive teams dedicate 20 to 30 minutes each week to structured planning. Here's how to organize it in practice.
The Monday morning (or Sunday evening) appointment
Block out a fixed time slot of 20 to 30 minutes. This time should not be negotiable.
Step 1: Review of the past week
What progress has been made? What has stalled? Which tasks have been postponed, and why?
Step 2: Identify the 3 priorities for the week
Not 10, not 20: a maximum of 3 priorities. These three tasks, if completed, will make your week a success. Choose them by asking yourself: "Which task, if left undone, will have the most significant consequences for my business?"
Step 3: Apply your prioritization method
Classify all other tasks using your chosen method (Eisenhower, ABC, MoSCoW, or ICE). Eliminate anything that has no value. Delegate what can be delegated.
Step 4: Block the slots in your calendar
A task without a dedicated time slot remains just an intention. Put your top three priorities in your calendar before anything else. Reserve your best hours (often in the morning) for high-value tasks.
Step 5: Allow a margin of 20 to 30%
Leave some free time to absorb unforeseen events. A 100% full schedule is a schedule that will derail at the first unexpected client call.
The daily review (5 minutes)
Every morning, before opening your emails, ask yourself one question: "What is the most important task I need to accomplish today?" Start with that. The rest will follow.
FAQ: Your questions about task prioritization
How do you prioritize when everything seems urgent at the same time?
This is a classic trap. When everything seems urgent, nothing really is. Apply the Eisenhower matrix And ask yourself this question for each task: "What happens, practically speaking, if I don't do it today?" If the answer is "not much," the task isn't truly urgent. Limit yourself to two or three genuine emergencies per day.
Which method is best suited for a team of fewer than 10 people?
The MoSCoW method is often the most effective for teams, as it forces collective decision-making and aligns everyone on the same priorities. For individual work within the same team, the Eisenhower Matrix or the ABC method complement the collective approach well.
How long does it take to establish a prioritization routine?
Allow two to three weeks to establish the habit. The first week, your Monday morning ritual will take 30 minutes. After a month, it will take you 15 minutes, and you won't be able to live without it. The important thing is to block out this time slot in your calendar like a client appointment: non-negotiable.
Is it possible to prioritize tasks without digital tools?
Absolutely. A notebook, a pen, and a clear method are all you need to get started. Digital tools add value as the team grows, projects multiply, or remote collaboration becomes necessary. Don't make your organization dependent on purchasing software: start simple, then upgrade later.
Djaboo: Manage your projects and priorities all in one place
Implementing effective prioritization is good. Maintaining it over time with an entire team is another matter entirely. That's precisely what Djaboo's project management functionality It allows you to: centralize tasks, assign responsibilities, track progress, and collaborate in real time, without needing any special technical skills. Designed for French micro-businesses and SMEs with 1 to 100 employees, Djaboo transforms your prioritization method into a fluid process shared by the entire team.













